People are so angry with the officer who arrested them that their first impression is that they are in need of an aggressive defense attorney who would scold and attack the officer in the case. They want their lawyer to be like Mike Tyson, at noon, out of his corner when he opens the bar and hits him so hard that he admits that his whole story is a false package set up to convict the innocent. In movies and on television, the judges favor these lawyers and freely plead their innocence. That is not real life. That is self-destructive behavior. That kind of “aggressive lawyer” can make you feel right now, a massive assault by a police officer. However, that kind of “aggressive lawyer” is guaranteed to lose your trial.
What Does Violent Crime Prevention Involve?
Many lawyers believe that an aggressive strategy includes the following:
- to add tons of movement
- to refuse all money you are offered
- to argue the whole issue in this case.
- This does not mean what it means to be an advocate for violent crime.
When you set up an aggressive crime prevention strategy, a strong criminal defense attorney will gather all the evidence against you, and challenge each individual. They will also conduct scientific evidence tests, interview witnesses, challenge eyewitness testimony, and challenge police conduct in obtaining credentials and eyewitnesses. An aggressive defense attorney will work to suppress the evidence against you so that the judge will not be questioned. Criminal lawyers are aggressive and can gather evidence knowingly to help with your case, or to challenge prosecution experts. Often, implementing an aggressive defense strategy means going to court, rather than accepting early negotiations.
What is an example of an aggressive defense strategy?
Suppose you were dragged by a police officer, given a field test for vision, failed a test on a respirator, and were subsequently charged with a DUI. The prosecutor’s case was based on four main points:
- Reason for initial suspension (incorrect driving, broken traffic rules, etc.),
- A police officer’s view of a parked car made him believe that he was driving under the influence of alcohol (obscene words, the smell of alcohol),
- A field balance assessment was provided, too
- Chemical testing of the respiratory tract.
- An aggressive criminal attorney can question the officer’s intentions in the first case, as well as the sensory perception that led him to believe he was under the influence.
This may include information about training and recording of the app. For example, if a police officer has received very little training especially in determining if a person is under the influence based on visual perception, then the individual is in need of an aggressive defense attorney. Your attorney may also ask the officer how he or she conducts the innocence tests. An expert to challenge the police officer’s method of comparing it to how tests should be performed can be identified. Finally, your attorney can gather evidence about a particular respirator used to test you. They can produce repair logs to prove that the machine may be faulty or that experts can testify to various physical conditions that may affect the results of air tests, such as GERD.
